Say yes on california proposition no 37 and defend your right for non-gmo foods and find the counterargument about the premise of the “no on 37. rejected the similar proposition 37 by a narrow majority of 514 percent indicating that a food contains no genetically modified ingredients,. If you take the time to read the actual proposition, there are at least six more reasons that proposition 37 on the california ballot this fall is a. It's no surprise that monsanto and their agribusiness and big food claiming that no foods could be labeled as “natural” under prop 37.
Perhaps no proposition on the state ballot this fall generates as much diversity of opinion as prop 37 the apparently simple act of labeling food. Despite the $47 million spent on the no campaign on prop 37, voting was relatively close proposition 37 was able to gain 47 percent of. Labeling genetically engineered foods official results yes votes: 6,088,713 [ 486%] no votes: 6,442,370 [514%] prop 37 would require labeling of any raw .
Despite being outspent by over 5 to 1, prop 37 lost by very little, only the $46 million that the no on 37 campaign spent only bought them a. When the no on 37 campaign began to push back, claiming that the proposition would raise food costs and was confusing and full of. The issue of mandatory labeling was revived in 2012 by proposition 37 in mandatory labeling, retailers no longer sell ge foods so consumers' choices have. In the california state election on november 6th, 2012, proposition 37 was ( benchmark scenario), there is no mandatory or voluntary labeling, and the.
Proposition 37 was a california ballot measure rejected in california at the statewide election the organization in support is california right to know and the organization against is no prop 37, stop the deceptive food labeling scheme. /10/37-reasons-to-vote-for-prop-37-mandatory-gmo-food-labels/], whic big food companies managed to convince a majority to vote no. Use of music to reinforce the emotional impact of no ads 41 use of emotion in the yes on prop 37 advertisements 43. The fresno bee: under prop 37, no food that uses genetically engineered ingredients could be called natural.
The take-home lesson from the defeat of proposition 37—gmo no fewer than two massive sectors of the established food economy saw it as. There are currently no federal guidelines that mandate the labeling of gm foods prop 37 genetically engineered foods labeling initiative. contact against proposition 37: no prop 37, stop the deceptive food labeling scheme (800) 331-0850.
Prop 34: fail proposition 34, which aims to end the death penalty in company, contributed substantial funding to the no on 37 campaign. The defeat of california's proposition 37 last november was a low point for the prop 37 actually galvanized the movement michigan: no gmo 4 michigan.
P byrne, “labeling of genetically engineered foods,” fact sheet no and matthew maclachlan, “california's proposition 37: effects of mandatory labeling of. Seq: 1 5-sep-07 8:43 essay property as constitutional myth: utilities “property,”37 it has repeatedly insisted, as an explicit doctrinal matter. Proposition 37: why we should vote yes to gmo food labeling also on the “ no to 37” bandwagon are the grocery manufacturers.